Week 6 Assignment: Family Assessments Comparison
Family Assessments
In addition to understanding the systemic nature of family life, the second major emphasis of this section is on the benefits and process of conducting family based assessments with clients. Assessment is a process of studying a person or group of people in order to come to conclusions about what he, she, or they are like. Often the result of assessment includes a decision as to whether the person or persons is/are “normal.” As such, it is important for therapists to grapple with the question of what “normal” is and of how much variation can be allowed within that definition.
Specifically, for this week, you will review three commonly used family assessments (FACES, SFI, and FAD). To start this week, examine each of the instrument samples provided and read each of the assigned articles and chapters related to these models/assessments.
Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales (FACES; based on Olson’s Circumplex model)
- The Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales (FACES)
- Olson, D. E., & Gorall, D. M. (2003). Circumplex model of marital and family systems.
Self-report Family Inventory (SFI; based on the Beavers model)
- The Dallas Self-report Family Inventory (SFI)
- Hampson, R., Hulgus, Y., & Beavers, W. (1991). Comparisons of self-report measures of the Beavers Systems Model and Olson’s Circumplex Model.
Family Assessment Device (FAD; based on the McMaster model)
- The Family Assessment Device (FAD)
- Epstein, N.B., Bishop, D. S., & Levin, S. (1978). The McMaster Model of Family Functioning.
- Epstein, N. B., Baldwin, L. M., & Bishop, D. S. (1983). The McMaster Family Assessment Device.
- Miller, I. W., Epstein, N. B., Bishop, D. S., & Keitner, G. I. (1985). The McMaster Family Assessment Device: Reliability and Validity.
Be sure to carefully review this week’s resources. You will be expected to apply the information from these resources when you prepare your assignments.
Books | |
Reference | Instruction |
---|---|
Williams, L., Edwards, T. M., Patterson, J., & Chamow, L. (2011) Essential assessment skills for couple and family therapist |
Read Chapter 9 |
Sperry, L. (2012) Family assessment: Contemporary and cutting-edge strategies |
Read Chapter 8 |
Articles | |
Reference | Instruction |
---|---|
Epstein, N. B., Baldwin, L. M., & Bishop, D. S. (1983). The McMaster Family Assessment Device. McMaster Family Assessment Device – FAD.pdf.pdf |
Read Article |
Epstein, N.B., Bishop, D. S., & Levin, S. (1978) The McMaster Model of Family Functioning. |
Read Article |
Hampson, R., Hulgus, Y., & Beavers, W. (1991). Comparisons of self-report measures of the Beavers Systems Model and Olson’s Circumplex Model. |
Read Article |
Miller, I. W., Epstein, N. B., Bishop, D. S., & Keitner, G. I. (1985). The McMaster Family Assessment Device |
Read Article |
Olson, D.H., & Gorall, D.M. (2003). Circumplex model of marital and family systems |
Read Article |
Document/OtherReferenceInstruction
FACES Assessment
FACES III and scoring instructions.pdf.pdf
Review Document
FAD Assessment
FAD Assessment and Scoring Instructions.pdf.pdf
Review Document
SFI Assessment
SFI- Assessment and Scoring Instructions.pdf.pdf
Review Document
Week 6 Assignment: Family Assessments Comparison
1.0 Distinguish the nature and uses of psychological tests, addressing the unique features of the systems-based assessment.
3.0 Critique the usefulness of specific individual, couple, and family assessments.
4.0 Implement systems theory and systemic thinking into the process of family assessment.
5.0 Appraise the validity of the definitions of what is “normal” in family life that are given in established theories of family functioning that underlie common family assessments.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "GET10" in your order"

