HCM420 M8 Project CSU Ethical Issues In Healthcare

Meets Expectation

The student clearly and thoroughly discusses the issue from a legal, ethical, and moral perspective.

Approaches Expectation

The student discusses the issue from a legal, ethical, and moral perspective but has some significant, but not major, flaws in definition, support, and articulation.

Below Expectation

The student discusses the issue but has some major flaws and errors in definition, support, and articulation.

Limited Evidence

The student’s discussion has numerous major flaws and arguments are not defined, supported, and articulated.

Meets Expectation

Provides strong or adequate thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications.

Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in thought, insight and analysis.

Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in thought, insight and analysis.

Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate thought, insight and analysis.

Meets Expectation

Conforms to project requirements regarding the specifications for selecting a topic; providing a legal ethical, a moral perspective; and answering questions posed in the assignment.

Approaches Expectation

Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

Below Expectation

Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

Limited Evidence

Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

Meets Expectation

Cites and integrates at least eight credible sources supporting the theoretical backing of the paper.

Approaches Expectation

Cites and integrates six credible sources supporting the theoretical backing of the paper.

Below Expectation

Cites and integrates three or four credible sources supporting the theoretical backing of the paper.

Limited Evidence

Cites and integrates two, or fewer credible sources supporting the theoretical backing of the paper.

Meets Expectation

Applies critical thinking and reasoning skills for effective analysis.

Approaches Expectation

Small number of significant but not major flaws or omissions in application of critical thinking skills.

Below Expectation

Includes major flaws or omissions, or numerous minor flaws, in application of critical thinking skills.

Limited Evidence

Critical thinking and reasoning skills are absent or ineffective.

Meets Expectation

Prescribes actions to effectively address a variety of ethical situations that support social responsibility.

Approaches Expectation

Small number of significant but not major flaws or omissions in prescribing actions to address ethical situations.

Below Expectation

Includes major flaws or omissions, or numerous minor flaws, in prescribing actions to address ethical situations.

Limited Evidence

Prescription of actions to address ethical situations is absent or ineffective.

Meets Expectation

Demonstrates effective leadership and teamwork skills.

Approaches Expectation

Small number of significant but not major flaws or omissions in demonstration of leadership and teamwork skills.

Below Expectation

Includes major flaws or omissions, or numerous minor flaws, in demonstration of leadership and teamwork skills.

Limited Evidence

Demonstration of leadership and teamwork skills is absent or ineffective.

Meets Expectation

Selects current technology applications and applies to specific problems and challenges in the work place and professional skills.

Approaches Expectation

No more than small number of minor flaws or omissions in selection of current technology applications.

Below Expectation

Includes major flaws or omissions, or numerous minor flaws, in selection of current technology applications.

Limited Evidence

Selection of current technology applications is absent or ineffective.

Meets Expectation

Essay or PowerPoint is clearly organized, well written, including an introduction, body, and conclusion. Conforms to project requirements.

Approaches Expectation

Small number of significant but not major flaws in organization and writing. In a minor way does not conform to project requirements.

Below Expectation

Major problems in organization and writing. In a significant way does not conform to project requirements.

Limited Evidence

Project is not well organized or well written. Does not conform to project requirements.

Meets Expectation

Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few or no minor errors in grammar and spelling; appropriate writing style; clear and concise with no unsupported comments.

Approaches Expectation

Small number of significant but not major errors in grammar and spelling; generally appropriate writing.

Below Expectation

Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; work needed on grammar and spelling; does not meet program expectations.

Limited Evidence

Poor quality; unacceptable in terms of grammar and/or spelling; inappropriate writing style that interferes with clarity.

Meets Expectation

Includes all items listed on APA rubric and includes less than two APA style guide mistakes within the paper itself. Citations and reference page are correctly formatted.

Approaches Expectation

Omits up to two items listed on APA rubric and includes less than four APA style guide mistakes within the paper itself. Citations and reference page are correctly formatted with minor mistakes.

Below Expectation

Omits up to four items listed on APA rubric and includes less than six APA style guide mistakes within the paper itself. Citations and reference page include numerous mistakes.

Limited Evidence

Omits five or more items listed on APA rubric and includes seven or more APA style guide mistakes within the paper itself. Citations and reference page are incorrectly formatted.