reply to 2 student posts
Original Assignment: Western Bank & Trust purchased land and a building for the lump sum of $3,000,000. To get the maximum tax deduction, Western allocated 90% of the purchase price tot he building and only 10% to the land. A more realistic allocation would have been 70% to the building and 30% to the land.
Requirements
- Explain the tax advantage of allocating too much to the building and too little to the land.
- Was Western’s allocation ethical? If so, state why. If not, why not? Identify who was harmed.
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "GET10" in your order"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a7772/a777243cdb32100c8a20d79d25b5612332ad2de4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/298f1/298f1746c82df17ea638fac25b83a84c56b7ed2b" alt=""