Discussion of company position against standards, business and finance homework help
Discussion of company position against standards
500 words
Company/ Insurance Australian Group Ltd
- Investigate and summarise the key capital adequacy and solvency standards for your nominated financial services company and, using publicly available data, discuss how well the company meets these standards. The summary should include statements of how the key standards are calculated and a table of key metrics specific to your company, i.e. an evaluation of company data against the required standards.
- Critically evaluate the Australian stock market’s efficiency.
|
Max |
Introduction |
1 |
Summary of key standards |
4 |
Calculations of company against standards |
4 |
Discussion of company position against standards |
4 |
Efficiency of Australian stock markets |
4 |
Conclusion |
1 |
Discretionary (spelling, grammar, presentation) |
2 |
Total |
20 marks |
Groups will comprise 2-4 students.
Groups are to notify their local lecturer of the members in a group by 13 March 2017. Any student who has not notified the local lecturer of his/her group affiliation by this time will be allocated into a group at random.
Groups are to request approval from the local lecturer to study a specific, nominated company. This company should be either an authorised (in Australia) deposit taker or a licensed (in Australia) insurance company. The requests are to be submitted 13 March 2017. Groups failing to submit a request by this time will be allocated a company to investigate. Each group must investigate a different company and approvals will be granted on a first come, first served basis.
APPENDIX 2
Rubric – Group Assignment
ILOs |
Criteria |
Standards |
||||
Below Expectations |
Meets Expectations |
Exceeds Expectations |
||||
Level 1 (NN) |
Level 2 (PA) |
Level 3 (CR) |
Level 4 (DI) |
Level 5 (HD) |
||
LO4 |
Australian and international financial markets |
Failure of basic understanding of International financial markets. Fails to address the questions posed. Arguments are implausible and unsubstantiated. Limited or irrelevant research. |
Demonstration of basic understanding of international financial markets. Arguments are generally plausible with some evidence. Basic research. |
Demonstration of good understanding of international financial markets. Arguments with reasonable support. Adequate research |
Demonstration of excellent understanding of international financial markets. Demonstrates high standard of insight and originality. More than adequate research.
|
Demonstration of outstanding understanding of international financial markets… Demonstrates an outstanding insight. A highly-structures and comprehensive response to questions. Extensive and relevant research. |
LO4 |
Australian and international financial institutions |
Failure of basic understanding international financial institutions. Fails to address the questions posed. Arguments are implausible and unsubstantiated. Limited or irrelevant research. |
Demonstration of basic understanding of international financial institutions. Arguments are generally plausible with some evidence. Basic research. |
Demonstration of good understanding of international financial institutions. Arguments with reasonable support. Adequate research |
Demonstration of excellent understanding of international financial institutions. Demonstrates high standard of insight and originality. More than adequate research.
|
Demonstration of outstanding understanding of international financial institutions. Demonstrates an outstanding insight. A highly-structures and comprehensive response to questions. Extensive and relevant research. |
LO5 |
Regulation of financial markets |
Failure of basic understanding of the regulation of financial markets in Australia. Fails to address the questions posed. Arguments are implausible and unsubstantiated. Limited or irrelevant research. |
Demonstration of basic understanding of the regulation of financial markets in Australia. Arguments are generally plausible with some evidence. Basic research. |
Demonstration of good understanding of the regulation of financial markets in Australia. Arguments with reasonable support. Adequate research |
Demonstration of excellent understanding of regulation of Australian financial markets. Demonstrates high standard of insight and originality. More than adequate research.
|
Demonstration of outstanding understanding of the regulation of financial markets in Australia. Demonstrates an outstanding insight. A highly-structures and comprehensive response to questions. Extensive and relevant research. |
LO5 |
Report organisation (Genre, pagination, format, spacing, grammar, spelling, punctuation, referencing) |
Poorly-written with errors in spelling and grammar. Mistakes in citations.
|
Written according to the academic and adheres to academic genre (e.g., with introduction, body of the text, and conclusion). Has accurate spelling, grammar and sentence construction.
|
Well-written and adheres to academic genre. There are no mistakes in citation.
|
Very well-written and adheres to academic genre (e.g., with introduction, body of the text, and conclusion).There are no mistakes n citation.
|
Expertly written and adheres to academic genre. Extraordinarily organised presentation with respect to organisation, clarity of expression, grammar, punctuation, pagination, spacing |