HU 240 Herzing University Week 3 Compare and Contrast Religions Paper

/in /by

Unit 3 Assessment – Compare and Contrast Religions

Submit Assignment

  • Due Sunday by 10:59pm


  • Points
     85
  • Submitting a text entry box or a

    file
     upload

Instructions

Contrast: Religions


Evaluation
 Title: Compare and Contrast Religions

At the end of unit 3, use the attached Comparison Chart to compile a table that compares and contrasts the foundational concepts and tenets of:

  1. Hinduism
  2. Judaism
  3. Christianity
  4. Islam
  5. Atheism
  6. Buddhism

Include in the comparison:

  1. the relationship to God(s)
  2. relationship to people
  3. primary scriptures
  4. primary rules of conduct
  5. at least 4 primary beliefs

Using the analysis that you did for the comparison table, explain what you think about each of the different categories of religions.

  • How does the diversity of religious beliefs benefit all mankind on the planet?
  • How do people use the diversity of religious beliefs to cause conflicts between groups of people?
  • Why do you think that so many people ignore the similarities between the different religions and only focus on the ways that they are divided?

Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

Estimated time to complete: 4 hours

Assignment File:

HU240 Unit 3 Assignment Comparison Chart [Word Document]

Rubric

HU240 Unit 3 Assessment – Compare and Contrast Religions

HU240 Unit 3 Assessment – Compare and Contrast Religions
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
27.0 pts

Level 5

Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner.

 24.0 pts

Level 4

Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with minor weaknesses in one or more of the areas.

 22.0 pts

Level 3

Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Expresses ideas in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with weaknesses in these area.

 19.0 pts

Level 2

Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are partially expressed in an organized, professional, and culturally respectful manner with major weaknesses in these areas.

 16.0 pts

Level 1

Expresses limited content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are not expressed in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and/or culturally respectful manner.

 0.0 pts

Level 0

The assignment was not completed or there are no constructed concepts that demonstrate analytically skills and no evidences to support the content does not align to the assignment instructions

27.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis
27.0 pts

Level 5

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with strong evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

 24.0 pts

Level 4

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

 22.0 pts

Level 3

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating analytical skills with some evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

 19.0 pts

Level 2

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating weak analytical skills with minimal evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

 16.0 pts

Level 1

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating inadequate evidence of analytical skills. There is minimal or no evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

 0.0 pts

Level 0

The assignment was not completed or there was no evidence of constructed concepts that are supported by professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

27.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTechnology
15.0 pts

Level 5

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement all assignment requirements.

 14.0 pts

Level 4

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement most assignment requirements.

 12.0 pts

Level 3

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement some assignment requirements.

 11.0 pts

Level 2

Manipulates multiple technological resources for some assignment requirements.

 9.0 pts

Level 1

Manipulates technological resources to minimally meet some assignment requirements.

 0.0 pts

Level 0

The assignment was not completed or difficulties with technological manipulation were evident. The assignment submitted does not meet requriements.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
10.0 pts

Level 5

The assignment exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

 6.0 pts

Level 4

The assignment exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

 4.0 pts

Level 3

The assignment exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The assignment has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication

 2.0 pts

Level 2

The assignment exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The assignment has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

 1.0 pts

Level 1

The assignment exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The assignment has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

 0.0 pts

Level 0

The assignment does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The assignment has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA
6.0 pts

Level 5

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included with no errors.

 5.0 pts

Level 4

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 1-2 minor APA errors.

 4.0 pts

Level 3

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 3 – 4 minor APA errors.

 3.0 pts

Level 2

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have more than 4 errors.

 2.0 pts

Level 1

The errors demonstrate limited understanding of in-text citation and reference requirements

 0.0 pts

Level 0

There are no in-text citations AND/OR references.

6.0 pts

Total Points: 85.0
 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "GET10" in your order"

If this is not the paper you were searching for, you can order your 100% plagiarism free, professional written paper now!

Order Now Just Browsing

All of our assignments are originally produced, unique, and free of plagiarism.

Free Revisions Plagiarism Free 24x7 Support