I have attached the postings for discussions below. Feel free to answer the postings in your own words, and must be at least 200 words. Please make sure to post each response LA2
Please remember to cite references if used. Each post is based off the subject below:
What values come into conflict in a typical “whistle-blowing” case? Explain your answer and use at least 2 of the ethical theories to analyze the case and reach a reasoned ethical judgment as to which value ought to be given precedence in the whistle-blower conflict. Make sure we know and can follow your ethical reasoning; defend your conclusion.