The Multi-Stakeholder Merging Experiences of Small Nonprofit Organizations: A Qualitative Case Study About the United Way
Chapter 4
Data Collection and Analysis
Criteria Quality Indicators | Evident | Not Evident | Not Applicable | |
Introduction | ||||
1 |
1-1 Previews the content of the chapter; explains what readers can expect in this chapter and grabs readers’ attention. 1-2 Provides the way in which it highlights what and how the results and/or findings of data analysis will be reported to answer the research questions and the hypotheses. 1-3 Informs how the results of data analysis will be used or transcribed. |
|||
Participants- Population Sample Description; Research Method and Design; Methodology Approach
|
||||
2 |
2-1 Uses a table, chart, and/or graph to show important results. 2-2 Includes the explanation or description of the statistical analysis, such as mean values, standard deviations, etc. 2-3 Includes examples to illustrate the data and additional points. 2-4 Uses illustrative quotes by strictly following the representation guidelines as agreed upon in the informed consent materials. |
|||
3 |
3-1 Includes the text to reference the appendix for the results that may involve complex details. 3-2 Selects proper and applicable ways to report raw data for individual participants and presentation of such reports meets high scholarly standards. |
|||
Data Collection Instruments; Data Analysis; Quantitative Analysis; Qualitative Analysis; Mixed-Methodology Analysis; Explanations of tests and approach applied to answer research questions
|
||||
4 |
Includes answers to the following questions: 4-1 Do(es) the finding(s) from data analysis connect to and or address research questions and hypotheses? 4-2 Are limitations/delimitations of the study and analysis of data identified? 4-3 Is/are the finding(s) supported by evidence? |
|||
5 |
Includes answers to the following questions: 5-1 Are the results easily accessible for the readers? 5-2 Are the results compiled in an organized manner? 5-3 Are the results presented in a structured and logical manner? |
|||
6 |
Includes answers to the following questions: 6-1 Do(es) the result(s) consider framework (conceptual and/or theoretical) that guided the study? 6-2 Do(es) the result(s) imply the magnitude and statistically significance of the study? 6-3 Do(es) the result(s) consider cross-validation and explain how the information might be generalized to an independent data set? (If application) |
|||
7 |
Includes answers to the following questions: 7-1 Are the consistency of the results considered and reflected? 7-2 How are the results of the multiple measures of a construct validated or translated? 7-3 How are the results of the similar constructs validated? |
|||
8 |
Includes answers to the following questions: 8-1 Do(es) the result(s) address potential implications for broader impacts and intellectual merits that implies the contributions to academic, non-academic, and scientific fields?
|
|||
Outcome of Analysis Findings; Analysis Summation
|
||||
9 |
9-1 Provides background of the design and methodology. 9-2 Provides outcome of findings from analysis. 9-3 The transition from Chapter 3 and to Chapter 4 are composed in a consistent and organized manner. |
|||
Stylistic Awareness | ||||
10 |
10-1 All arguments are written in coherent and convincing manner supported by credible, relevant, and substantive evidence. 10-2 Organizational structures (i.e. introduction, headings for core areas, transition between the paragraphs, and conclusion) are purposeful, effective, and skillful. 10-3 Uses conventions of the academic writing style (grammar, punctuation, spelling) are at the level expected for publication; consistently uses an effective academic voice and scholarly tone.) 10-4 Adheres to APA style in text citations, references, and conventions to reduce bias in language. |
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "GET10" in your order"

